Conclusions Three main conclusions can be drawn from the present ERP results. Supporting Information. S1 File. Model comparison for behavioural data analysis. S2 File. Empathy Quotient correlation analysis. S1 Table. Initial omnibus analyses for the early utterance time-window. S2 Table. Initial omnibus analyses for the late utterance time-window. Acknowledgments We thank Dr. References 1.
Wittgenstein L. Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell; Austin JL. How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press; Levinson SC. Action formation and ascription. In: Stivers T, Sidnell J, editors. The handbook of conversation analysis. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell; Searle JR. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Schegloff EA. Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Speech act distinctions in syntax.
In: Shopen T, editor. Language typology and syntactic description. Heritage J. Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Res Lang Soc Interact. View Article Google Scholar 8. Language Baltim. View Article Google Scholar 9. Heldner M, Edlund J. Pauses, gaps and overlaps in conversations. J Phon. View Article Google Scholar Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Indefrey P, Levelt WJ. The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components.
Planning at the phonological level during sentence production. J Psycholinguist Res. Schegloff EA, Sacks H. Opening up closings. The effects of common ground and perspective on domains of referential interpretation. J Mem Lang. Pragmatic effects on reference resolution in a collaborative task: Evidence from eye movements. Cogn Sci. The role of perspective in identifying domains of reference. Addressees distinguish shared from private information when interpreting questions during interactive conversation.
Nurmsoo E, Bloom P. Psychol Sci. Indirect speech acts.
As already mentioned, goodbye seems to express a content equivalent to that in Sign in to annotate. This book is not yet featured on Listopia. From Utterances to Speech Acts. Where can we turn, within Homer, to find performance?
In: Cole P, Morgan J, editors. Syntax and semantics, 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press; Beyond the language given: The neural correlates of inferring speaker meaning. Cereb Cortex. Pragmatics in action: Indirect requests engage theory of mind areas and the cortical motor network. J Cogn Neurosci. When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N effect. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: Evidence from the N An electrophysiological exploration of figurative language processing.
Integration operations during irony processing. PLoS One. On the incrementality of pragmatic processing: An ERP investigation of informativeness and pragmatic abilities. Noveck IA, Posada A. Characterizing the time course of an implicature: An evoked potentials study.
Brain Lang. Early and parallel processing of pragmatic and semantic information in speech acts: Neurophysiological evidence. Front Hum Neurosci. Neural dynamics of speech act comprehension: An MEG study of naming and requesting. Brain Topogr.
Coulson S, Lovett C. Comprehension of nonconventional indirect requests: An event-related brain potential study. Riv Linguist. Less is not more: Neural responses to missing and superfluous accents in context. The influence of information structure on the depth of semantic processing: How focus and pitch accent determine the size of the N effect. Understanding by addressees and overhearers. Cogn Psychol.
Speech act recognition in conversation: Experimental evidence. Proceedings of the 34th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, Texas: Cognitive Science Society; Presequences and indirection: Applying speech act theory to ordinary conversation. J Pragmat. The time course of generating causal antecedent and causal consequence inferences. Discourse Process. Kutas M. In the company of other words: Electrophysiological evidence for single word and sentence context effects. Lang Cogn Process. Blakemore D. Understanding utterances: An introduction to pragmatics.
Oxford: Blackwell; On temporal aspects of turn taking in conversational dialogues. Speech Commun. Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S. The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. J Autism Dev Disord. In: The comprehensive R archive network internet. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing.
Jaeger TF. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Brown CM, Hagoort P. On the electrophysiology of language comprehension: Implications for the human language system. Architectures and mechanisms for language processing. Coulson S. Electrophysiology and pragmatic language comprehension. Experimental pragmatics.
Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan; How word frequency modulates masked repetition priming: An ERP investigation. Bar M. The proactive brain: memory for predictions. A look around at what lies ahead: Prediction and predictability in language processing. In: Bar M, editor. Predictions in the brain: Using our past to generate a future.
Remembering the past to imagine the future: The prospective brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. Pickering MJ, Garrod S. An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behav Brain Sci. Schank R, Abelson R. Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Oxford, England: Lawrence Erlbaum; Altmann G, Kamide Y.
Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Federmeier KD. Thinking ahead: The role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. Lexical versus conceptual anticipation during sentence processing: Frontal positivity and N ERP components. Int J Psychophysiol.
Hagoort P. The fractionation of spoken language understanding by measuring electrical and magnetic brain signals.
Grice HP. Logic and conversation. Syntax and semantics, 3: Speech Acts. The neurocognition of syntactic processing. The neurocognition of language. Kolk H, Chwilla D. Late positivities in unusual situations. Prediction during language comprehension: Benefits, costs, and ERP components. Int J Psychophysiol, ; — Holtgraves T.
The role of the right hemisphere in speech act comprehension. Foldi NS.
Request PDF on ResearchGate | From utterances to speech acts | Most of the time our utterances are automatically interpreted as speech acts: as assertions. Cambridge Core - Semantics and Pragmatics - From Utterances to Speech Acts - by Mikhail Kissine.
Appreciation of pragmatic interpretations of indirect commands: Comparison of right and left hemisphere brain-damaged patients. Coulson S, Wu YC. Right hemisphere activation of joke-related information: An event-related brain potential study. When elephants fly: Differential sensitivity of right and left inferior frontal gyri to discourse and world knowledge. Right and left hemisphere cooperation for drawing predictive and coherence inferences during normal story comprehension. Lang Linguist Compass. ERPs reveal sensitivity to hypothetical contexts in spoken discourse.
An electrophysiological study of mood, modal context, and anaphora. Brain Res. Listening to the sound of silence: Disfluent silent pauses in speech have consequences for listeners. Distinct neural correlates underlying pretense and false belief reasoning: Evidence from ERPs. Sabbagh MA, Taylor M. Neural correlates of theory-of-mind reasoning: An event-related potential study. Frith CD, Frith U. The neural basis of mentalizing. Linguistic and embodied formats for making concrete offers. Discourse Stud. Osterhout L, Holcomb PJ. Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly.
Views on how the electrical activity that the brain generates reflects the functions of different language structures. King J, Kutas M. Who did what and when? Using word-and clause-level ERPs to monitor working memory usage in reading. When temporal terms belie conceptual order. Kluender R, Kutas M. Bridging the gap: Evidence from ERPs on the processing of unbounded dependencies.
Event-related brain potentials reflect discourse-referential ambiguity in spoken language comprehension. Ward G, Hirschberg J. B: She can concentrate very well. C: Catherine is a butterfly flitting from flower to flower. In conversation A and B, B gives information as required. In conversation A and C, C invites a metaphorical interpretation.
Type of Maxim — Maxim of Relevance T The maxim of relevance requires us, as speakers, to make our utterances relative to the discourse going on and the contexts in which they are occur. C: The dog is looking very happy. A: What on earth has happened to the roast beef? B: The roast beef is looking well-done. Conversation A and B is relevant answer. Conversation A and C is not relevant answer. T A: What are you baking?
B: I am baking chicken, beef and fish. In conversation A and B, B gives answer perspicuous the maxim of manner : because B gives a clear, brief, orderly to explanation. C: Be I are tea aitch deeay wyesee ay kayee. In conversation A and C, C does not give answer perspicuous violation of the maxim of manner : because C does not gives a clear, brief, orderly to explanation. Assertive utterances are concerned with facts. The function is to tell what the speaker know or believe. The purpose is to inform. Example: We declare that most plastic are made from soy beans.
Performative utterances make things happen just by being uttered. It is valid if spoken by someone whose right to make them is accepted and in circumstances which are accepted as appropriate.
MA Verdictive utterance is speech acts in which the speaker makes an assessment or judgement about the acts of the addressee. Include: ranking, assessing, appraising, condoning. The action is beneficial to the speaker: Thank …… for Grateful to ….
An Expressive utterances springs from the previous actions or failure to act of the speaker. In other words, Expressive utterances occur when speakers tell of their own past deeds and present feelings. Expressive utterances are thus retrospective and speaker-involved.
Directive utterances are those in which the speaker tries to get the addressee to perform some act or refrain from performing an act. Three kinds of directive utterances: commands, requests, and suggestions. Three kinds of directive utterance A command is effective only if the speaker has some degree of control over the actions of the addressee. Smoking is not permitted in the lavatories The boss demands that these letters should go out today. Surprisingly, the cognitive correlates of this essential component of human communication have received little attention.
This book fills the gap by providing a model of the psychological processes involved in interpreting and understanding speech acts. The theory is framed in naturalistic terms and is supported by data on language development and on autism spectrum disorders. Mikhail Kissine does not presuppose any specific background and addresses a crucial pragmatic phenomenon from an interdisciplinary perspective.